季度回顾

Our website is one of the primary ways prospective students and their parents learn about our programs and all online information needs periodic review for accuracy. The goal of the quarterly review is to catch old or inaccurate information quickly so that we can provide the best experience possible for our web viewers, 减少混淆, and communicate clearly the value of a Walla Walla University education.

Once each quarter, all departments should do a review of their web pages. Use this checklist to guide you in your review. Please go through each item carefully and fix any issues that you find or contact the Web Content Manager for help in resolving the issue.

In addition to maintaining accuracy and quality in our content, a goal of this quarterly review is to provide the space to spark new ideas. As you review your content and have new ideas you'd like to see implemented on your pages, please contact the Web Content Manager—innovation is encouraged!

主页

• Is the list of degrees offered listed still accurate?
• Is there new information that can be added to sections like “what our graduates are doing now” or “what our graduates say about our program”
• Are the reasons listed for students to choose your program at WWU compelling?
• Are there new opportunities that students in your program should take advantage of that are not yet listed on the website? (实习, club activities, etc.)

教师页面

• Does bio information need to be updated/added? 
• 标题正确吗??
• Is all contact information correct?
• Are photos current and consistent? All faculty photos should have a white background—例子.

Academic Program page

• Are all current offerings displayed? Does everything match what is listed in the current 学术报告?
• Do all bulletin links lead to the correct page in the current 学术报告?

讨论会页面

• If you have a colloquium page, is it up-to-date?
• Should you consider adding a colloquium page?

整体

• Has your department published a newsletter or report that needs to be added to the website?
• Are there deadlines listed anywhere that have expired?
• Are there any broken links?
• Are links written in an informative way?